Strategic decision-making is an iterative process презентация

Strategic decision-making is an iterative process Financial ambition Dividend share of 40% Equity to asset ratio >30% ROCE between 10-15% Where to play & How to win Bonava potential

Слайд 1Strategy workshop
2017-05-17
08/06/2017


Слайд 2Strategic decision-making is an iterative process
Financial ambition
Dividend share of 40%
Equity to

asset ratio >30%
ROCE between 10-15%

Where to play &
How to win



Bonava potential to capture
Historical performance
RMS position
Ability to achieve competitive advantage


Market attractiveness
Long-term market potential
Potential to convert demand to deals


Resource limitations
Capital
Management attention
Resources/capabilities

08/06/2017

1

2

3

4


Слайд 3Slowing down of housing price increases most common
08/06/2017


Слайд 4Large difference in size of Bonava’s regions
08/06/2017
Source: Data collections
0.4
Ostsee
1.2
Greater Gothenburg
0.6
Tallinn
0.6
2.3
1.8
Rhein-Main
3.0
Köln/Bonn
Copenhagen
Stockholm county
5.3
Rhein-Ruhr
4.0
Rhein-Neckar/Stuttgart
4.5
St

Petersburg

5.5

2.5 (Brandenburg)

3.7 (Berlin)

Berlin incl. Brandenburg

6.2

1.5

Sachsen

Hamburg

1.0

1.8

Greater Helsinki

1.4

Riga

Linköping

0.2

Turku

0.2

Oulu

Umeå

0.2

0.1

Tampere

0.2

Uppsala

Bergen

0.2

Population in our regions. million inhabitants


Слайд 5All regions have positive population growth rate
08/06/2017
Note: For Sachsen and Köln/Bonn

assumed provided figure was for period 2010-2016. Recalculated to get a yearly value























1.2%

Uppsala

Linköping

1.5%

Bergen

1.0%

1.0%

St Petersburg

Oulu

1.5%

Umeå

Greater Gothenburg

1.0%

Sachsen

1.9%

Stockholm county

1.1%

2.0%

Rhein-Main

Rhein-Ruhr

1.7%

1.5%

0.5%

0.5%

Hamburg

0.5% (only
Berlin 0.95%)

Ostsee

Rhein-Neckar/Stuttgart

0.4%

0.4%

Berlin incl Brandenburg

1.2%

Tallinn

Copenhagen

1.1%

Köln/Bonn

Turku

0.7%

0.8%

Tampere

Riga

0.9%

Greater Helsinki

0.6%

Population vs. population growth. %

Yearly population growth

Total population


Слайд 6Differences in market risk parameters between our markets
08/06/2017

Denmark
Norway
Copenhagen
Sweden
Lithaunia
Germany
Finland
Estonia
Latvia
Lithaunia
Norway
Denmark
Estonia
Russia
Latvia
Sweden
Finland
Germany
Ease of doing business

(ranking 1 = Best country in the world)

Currency volatility (compared to SEK). %


Слайд 7
Backup: What is included in ease of doing business
08/06/2017


Ease of doing

business

Ranking by The World Bank

Purpose:
Economies are ranked on the ease of doing business. from 1–190
A high ease of doing business ranking means the regulatory environment is more conducive to the starting and operation of a local firm

Included sub parameters

Starting a business

Estonia (14)

Germany (114)

Dealing with construction permit

Denmark (6)

Russia (115)

Getting electricity

Germany (5)

Latvia (42)

Registering property

Estonia (6)

Germany (79)

Getting Credit

Latvia (7)

Norway (75)

Protecting Minority investors

Norway (9)

Finland (70)

Paying taxes

Denmark (7)

Russia (45)

Enforcing contracts

Norway (4)

Finland (40)

Trading cross borders

Denmark (1)

Russia (140)

Resolving insolvency

Finland (1)

Russia (51)

Best performing of our markets (global position)

Worst performing of our markets (global position)


Слайд 8Market attractiveness model weight together scores
08/06/2017


Market attractiveness ranking


Слайд 9Back up: Details of model
1. Market characteristic
4. Economic sentiment
Factor
Description
Payment terms from

customers
Payment terms for land

Project development time

Market concentration

Unemployment

GDP growth
Customer activity

08/06/2017



Always included

Included for short term evaluation

Measured by 3 archetypes
Share of options/off balance percent (of total plots) (internal data)
Average time between TG2 and TG4 (internal data)
Market share of top 4 players

Absolute unemployment rate
Forecasted unemployment rate change
Forecasted GDP growth
Number of transaction per inhabitant

Metric

When good (high or low figure)

n/a
High

Low

Low

Low
Low
High
High

Weight

25%

2. Long term demand and supply balance

Population

Demand-Supply balance

Total population in the region
Forecasted population growth
Historic housing price development

High
High
High

3. Market risk

Industry concentration

Country risk
Currency risk

Binary metric (1 or 0). 1 if you have a clear industry concentration
World bank – Ease doing business index
Daily currency volatility

Low
Low
Low

25%

50%

7.5%
7.5%

5%

5%

15%
5%
5%

0%1
25%
25%

1) All current cities score 0 so excluded from analysis


Слайд 10Sweden and Germany in top
08/06/2017

Ostsee
Oulu
St Petersburg
Tampere
Turku
Linköping
Köln/Bonn
Stockholm county
Greater Gothenburg
Greater Helsinki
Hamburg
Tallinn
Rhein-Neckar/Stuttgart
Bergen
Berlin
Rhein-Ruhr
Sachsen
Uppsala
Rhein-Main
Riga
Copenhagen
Umeå
Market attractiveness ranking

score – Including short term factors i.e.. economic sentiments

Слайд 11
Agreed current situation at EMG meeting
08/06/2017


Construction cost (cost/m2)
Accumulated production volume in

same platform

Sweden

Norway

Finland

Denmark

St Petersburg


Single family SE


Germany

Experience curve


Baltics


Слайд 12Market attractiveness – Data driven strategy process
Strategic ideas
Beyond 2020
What if the

crisis comes

Agenda

08/06/2017



Слайд 13Beyond 2020 we should accelerate growth
08/06/2017

2016-2020
2021-2025
Mature all markets for future strength
Establish

Design & Production. procurement
Build brand awareness
Set the company culture
Ensure a not to wide spread footprint
Grow at certain “sweet spots” e.g.. Germany

Слайд 14To achieve 10% growth 2020-2025 different potential scenarios
08/06/2017
1) Since average sales

prices per units are lower in Germany. Latvia and Estonia – total number of units increase more when increasing net sales with 105 per annum

Baltics

Denmark/Norway

740

540

720

13,077

Scenario 1 - 10 % growth all markets

2020 (F1)

1

12,850

7,979


New markets

Germany

Sweden

Finland

12,850

St Petersburg

Number of completed units Consumers + Investors, Units

2020

Example scenarios 2025 leading to 10% net sales growth

Net sales grows from ~19 BSEK (2020) to ~32 BSEK (2025)
No margin improvements included – Improving margins could reduce the needed for top line growth
No adjustment done for housing price increases



Scenarios to proceed with and develop scenarios for


Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое ThePresentation.ru?

Это сайт презентаций, докладов, проектов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint. Мы помогаем школьникам, студентам, учителям, преподавателям хранить и обмениваться учебными материалами с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика