Project Kick-Off. External Supervisory Interface for Process Automation презентация

timeline, and budget
Make-or-buy
Hardware and Software
Testing
Test articles, test stands, test documents, and test software

Agenda

Acceptance criteria
Assumptions, constraints, and challenges
Rules of engagement
Etiquette
Communication
Workflow
Assignment of duties and responsibilities

purpose of providing real-time supervisory tool for QC engineers team
The project execution will include software development, security audit and interface usability analysis
The possibility of remote supervising the manufacturing process will decrease quality issues reports by 5 times according to collected and analyzed statistical data.

Project Overview

the necessity of implementing 6 sigma management in order to reduce quality issues.
Sponsor: Automotive Business Unit with corporation as the most sensitive to deviations in process in terms of final product quality.
Stakeholders (all are internal):
Head of procurement EMEA region
Head of Automotive EMEA region
Head of Manufacturing site in Russia
Head of IT EMEA region

Customer, Sponsor, and Stakeholders

Lab
Engineering: IT architecture manager
Purchasing, Contracts: head of procurement Russia
Quality: Head of IT Russia, Head of QC lab
Operations: CS solutions (outsourcing), IT team, QC engineers, Manufacturing team engineers
Human resources: HR engineer

The Project Team

help of remote interface supervising materials preassembling and manufacturing process.
Where: Manufacturing site in Russia
How: To implement secure and usable interface to supervise all steps of manufacturing process
Who: The team will include internal resources, outsourcing. End users: QC engineers.
Why: The purpose of the project is to reduce issues with quality and thus to increase production capacity of installed equipment.

Project Scope

15,000 USD monthly
SW upgrade support and changes implementation – 120,000 USD annually

Budget

rate is not clear.
Salary increase effect – 840,000 USD annually
Savings: 1,560,000 USD annually

Make – or – Buy [Alternatives]

Adding dedicated QC lab engineer in production to each line
Time to hire and train: 15 months (3,200,000 USD potential lost)
Additional costs: 560,000 USD annually
EHS insurance: 75,000 USD annually.
Savings: 2,550,000 USD annually

articles
Allan Bradley controller
Data transferring SW
Test plan & Procedures
Monthly security audit
Weekly prototypes evaluations
Test acceptance criteria
Unauthorized access cases -> 0
Performance: real-time delays < ½ sec

Test and Validation

and security audit positive reports
Final adjustments and deploying in production environment

Customer Acceptance Criteria

used only for supervising. For interfering, separate channel of communication with manufacturing team must be used.
No dedicated employee will be needed to watch the dashboard. QC lab has enough resources.
User Interface will resemble control panels interface in production in read-only mode.

Assumptions and Constraints

Constraints
Due to extended demands to security, the module development will require expensive resources.
Even after most thorough tests and debug process, we still reserve some time for problems solving in production within 6 weeks of operations.

designed UI and performance for QC engineer to supervise the process
External challenges
To exclude any possibility of unauthorized access to the system

Challenges

basis
Status reports – after each milestone
Actions – actions plan submitted to heads of departments on weekly basis
Meetings
Kick Off meeting, by PM
Prototype review and acceptance meetings by IT
Status reports meetings by PM
Workflow
9-00 a.m. short meeting
Weekly: each Wednesday, 10-00 a.m. – 11-00 a.m.: progress review
By milestones completion – status review

Rules of Engagement