Why Open Education? презентация

Содержание

This presentation is licensed CC BY unless indicated otherwise in notes

Слайд 1Why Open Education?
Three Arguments


David Wiley
Lumen / BYU / Creative Commons


Слайд 2This presentation is licensed CC BY unless indicated otherwise in notes


Слайд 3Download these slides davidwiley.org


Слайд 4< philosophical >


Слайд 5education


Слайд 6education =


Слайд 7education = sharing


Слайд 8sharing


Слайд 9what you know


Слайд 10sharing


Слайд 11feedback


Слайд 12sharing


Слайд 13encouragement


Слайд 14sharing


Слайд 15passion


Слайд 16sharing


Слайд 17yourself


Слайд 18education


Слайд 19searching for parking


Слайд 20faculty meetings


Слайд 21tenure and promotion


Слайд 22educative acts


Слайд 24sharing


Слайд 26sharing


Слайд 27education


Слайд 29“rivalrous”


Слайд 31“nonrival”


Слайд 32sharing


Слайд 33asynchronously?


Слайд 34externalize


Слайд 37externalized ideas


Слайд 38converted to rivalrous


Слайд 41externalized & nonrivalrous?


Слайд 42“internet”


Слайд 46externalized ideas


Слайд 47externalized ideas + internet =


Слайд 48nonrival


Слайд 50unprecedented capacity


Слайд 51sharing


Слайд 52education = sharing


Слайд 53unprecedented capacity


Слайд 54educate


Слайд 55except we can’t


Слайд 59Tech Enables
Law Forbids


Слайд 64in the air?


Слайд 66Open Educational Resources


Слайд 67open ≠ free


Слайд 68open = free + permissions


Слайд 69The 5Rs


Слайд 70Retain is fundamental


Слайд 71The 5Rs


Слайд 73Open
1. Free and unfettered access

2. Perpetual, irrevocable copyright permissions


Слайд 75Tech Enables
OER
Permits


Слайд 76traditionally © materials + internet


Слайд 78openly licensed materials + internet


Слайд 80< / philosophical >


Слайд 81< innovation >


Слайд 82Infrastructure


Слайд 83
Infrastructure is “resources that create benefits for society primarily through the

facilitation of downstream productive activities.”

-- Brett Frischmann



Слайд 84“downstream productive activities”


Слайд 85Permissionless Innovation

Adam Thierer
Equal Participation in Innovation

Eric Von Hippel


Слайд 86Infrastructure and Innovation


Слайд 87Relatively inexpensive Broad permissions


Слайд 88thrives when the costs and obstacles to experimenting are low


Слайд 89“Intellectual infrastructure” is “nonrival input into a wide variety of outputs.”

-- Brett Frischmann



Слайд 90
Educational Materials
Research Articles
Intellectual Infrastructure for Ed


Слайд 91
Extremely expensive Very narrow permissions
Educational Materials
Research Articles


Слайд 92Extremely Expensive
Only those with significant capital can afford to experiment and

innovate

Слайд 94$1288
$1666


Слайд 95Textbook Pricing in Context


Слайд 96Accelerating Journal Costs


Слайд 97Very Narrow Permissions
ALL Rights Reserved


Слайд 99Trouble with Costs and Permissions?


Слайд 100Open
1. Free and unfettered access

2. Perpetual, irrevocable copyright permissions


Слайд 101The Content Oligarchies
Textbooks (74%)
Pearson
Cengage
McGraw-Hill
Journals (73%)
Reed-Elsevier
Wiley-Blackwell
Springer
Taylor & Francis
Sage


Слайд 102Open Education Infrastructure
Will enable everyone to innovate

Will enable everyone to benefit


Слайд 103< / innovation >


Слайд 104< evidence >


Слайд 105
Textbook Costs and Student Success
Outcomes
Cost
Access


Слайд 106
Internet, Textbook Costs, Student Success
Outcomes
Cost
Access


Слайд 108The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes Robinson,

Fischer, Hilton, and Wiley Published in Ed Researcher

Слайд 109Participants
Nebo School District
4183 students
43 teachers
Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry


Слайд 110Method
Quasi-experimental design with:
Treatment and Control Group
Pre and Post Test
Dependent variable: Score

on 2012 statewide standardized science exam
Independent variable: Textbook condition
15 Covariates: including age, gender, special education, English language proficiency, 2011 test data, 2011 GPA, and race

Слайд 111Propensity Score Matching

Increased group balance by 98%


Слайд 112Outcome: State Standardized Test

IRT scaled scores increased with open textbooks, p

< .001

Multiple r squared = .635 (variance in scores accounted for in our model)

Слайд 113A Multi-institutional Study of the Impact of Open Textbook Adoption on

the Learning Outcomes of Post-secondary Students Fischer, Hilton, Robinson, and Wiley Accepted in JCHE

Слайд 114Participants
4909 treatment
11,818 control
50 different undergraduate courses
130 teachers
10 institutions


Слайд 115Method
Quasi-experimental design with:
Propensity Score Matching
Post Test Only
Dependent variables: Completion; C or

Better; Credits Enrolled This Term; Next Term
Independent variable: Textbook condition
3 covariates: including age, gender, and race

Слайд 117Credits Taken


Слайд 118The Tidewater Z-Degree and the INTRO Model for Sustaining OER Adoption Wiley,

DeMarte, Williams, and Hilton Accepted in EPAA

Слайд 119Associates of Business
“Z Degree”
Graduate without ever buying a textbook
World’s first “all-OER”

degree
~30% cheaper for students

Слайд 120When a student drops, it..
Slows down their graduation

Costs the institution tuition

dollars
(refunds)

Слайд 121(182 * .89 * $164.35 * 3) in-state +
(182 *

.11 * $358.95 * 3) out-of-state =
$101,042 annual INTRO


INTRO Model


Слайд 122Mad, Glad, Sad, Rad: A Framework for Evaluating the Academic Return

on Investment in Textbooks and Other Educational Materials Wiley, Hilton, Fischer, and Puente Submitted

Слайд 123Cost
Completing with C or Better
Student Success per Dollar
0
100%
$200


Слайд 124Cost
Completing with C or Better

Commercial
Student Success per Dollar
0
100%
$200


Слайд 125Cost
Completing with C or Better


Commercial
OER
Student Success per Dollar
0
100%
$200


Слайд 126 Completing with C or Better
Student Success per Dollar
0
100%



Cost
$250
$0


Слайд 127openedgroup.org/review


Слайд 12811 Peer Reviewed Studies
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 129 48,623 Students
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 13093% Same or Better Outcomes
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 1319 Peer Reviewed Studies of Perceptions of OER Quality
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 1324,510 Professors and Students
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 133
50%
Same
35%
Better
15%
Worse
http://openedgroup.org/


Слайд 134
impact.lumenlearning.com


Слайд 135< / evidence >


Слайд 136Why open education?


Слайд 137Why open education?
Better philosophical alignment
Increased academic freedom for faculty
Better academic outcomes

for students
Positive institutional budget impacts


Слайд 138Why not open education?


Слайд 139Discussion!
davidwiley.org


Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое ThePresentation.ru?

Это сайт презентаций, докладов, проектов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint. Мы помогаем школьникам, студентам, учителям, преподавателям хранить и обмениваться учебными материалами с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика