TheMedia is the Pedagogy презентация

Содержание

Learning & Networks Trump Teaching, Innovation and Pedagogy

Слайд 1The Media is the Pedagogy

Jon Dron & Terry Anderson
Athabasca University


Слайд 2
Learning & Networks
Trump Teaching, Innovation and Pedagogy


Слайд 3Values
We can (and must) continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost

and time efficiency of the learning experience.
Student control and freedom is integral to 21st century life-long education and learning.
Continuing education opportunity is a basic human right.

Слайд 4E-Learning is not the same


Слайд 5Learning as Dance (Anderson, 2008)
Technology sets the beat and the timing.

Pedagogy defines the moves.

Слайд 6learning together


Слайд 7The two biggest e-learning success stories so far?


Слайд 8The two biggest e-learning success stories so far?


Слайд 9A typology of social forms
Learning Alone
The group Hierarchies, membership, intentionality, collaboration, boundaries
The

net Personal connections, fuzzy boundaries, emergence
The set Publication, aggregation, anonymity, cooperation
The collective Computational agents, algorithms, analytics, visualization, crowd wisdom/mob stupidity

Слайд 10Learning Alone
Maximizes Freedom:
Space, time, pace,
Allows and promotes

individualization
Freedom from “group think”
Power of auto-didacticism
Lifelong learning
Freedom from groups


Слайд 11Self Directed or Self Paced learning
Learner sets start date and the

time to completion
Continuous assessment
Maximizes learner control
Higher drop out
Ted Talks, Khan Academy, OERU
Only one of the Major MOOCs (Udacity) providers offers this option

Слайд 13Everyone can own a MOOC


Слайд 14Then there was groups…


Слайд 15Constructivist Learning in Groups
Long history of research and study
Established sets of

tools
Classrooms
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Synchronous (chat, video & net conferencing)
Email, wikis, blogs
Need to develop face to face, mediated and blended group learning skills

Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.


Слайд 16
Increase in learning outcomes, social skills, positive attitudes to learning BUT
“the

need for cooperative teams to mature implies that cooperative learning does not yield an immediate improvement …need for patience and persistence… students experienced in cooperative learning”

Hsiung, C.-m. (2012). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 119-137.


Слайд 17Flipped Classroom


Слайд 19Formal Education offers only these two models


Слайд 20…then networks


Слайд 22Networks
Emergent
Persistent
Bursty
Span boundaries
Easy entry & exit
Often informal
Communities of practice


Слайд 23Networks add diversity to learning
“People who live in the intersection of

social worlds are at higher risk of having good ideas” Burt, 2005, p. 90

Edge effects, estuary learning


Слайд 24Estuary Learning


Слайд 25Social Network Tools
Tools for Building Personal Networks of people and Resources
Means

to reify and share knowledge
Ownership and identity
Supports long term networking partnerships, relationships, alumni
Weak and strong ties
Boundary crossing and serendipity
Place for coalescence of sets into networks and groups, nets into groups.
Discovery, external validation and cross network enrichment


Слайд 26Privacy Concern by Age
Anderson, T., Poelhuber, B., & McKerlich, R. (2010).

Self Paced Learners Meet Social Software: An exploration of Learners’ attitudes, expectations and experience. . Online Journal of Distance Education Administration, 13(3). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/Fall133/anderson_poellhuber_mcKerlich133.html.

Слайд 27There were always sets…
…but we didn’t pay much attention to them


Слайд 28Sets: People with shared attributes and a common virtual or physical space


Слайд 29Cooperation
Sharing
Curation
Tagging
Co-editing
Co-creating


Слайд 30Co-operation: working independently for the greater good
Collaboration: working together for the

greater good

Слайд 32Why sets?


Слайд 33Eric Whitacer’s Virtual Choir (4)


Слайд 34Sets are good for…
finding answers
finding people
starting groups and networks
diverse perspectives
serendipity
learner choice
freedom
reducing

loneliness

Слайд 35Set of all people suffering from anxiety in online classes
Please take

my survey on anxiety in online classes:  https://unt.az1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_8qdDXVgm7vmYEtL
 
This is a rather short survey (22 questions).  It is for an in-class assignment, is a pilot for future study, and the results will not be published.  More details are on the survey’s informed consent form. 
 
Thank you!
 
--Alana S. Phillips
 
doctoral student
University of North Texas
alanaphillips@my.unt.edu

Sets for Research as well as Learning


Слайд 37Why contribute to a set?


Слайд 39Depth and engagement


Слайд 40Trust
The problem of evil
The problem of stupidity
The problem (?) of diversity


Слайд 41open
unprotected
disclosed
exposed
insecure

closed
protected
private
hidden
safe
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014) Agoraphobia and the modern learner.

Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/2014-03/html.

Слайд 42Collectives


Слайд 44capture
process
feedback


Слайд 45Collective concerns
filter bubbles
path dependencies
intentional abuse
selection bias
Matthew Effect
missing pedagogical models
echo chambers


Слайд 46Universities
departments
companies
nations
Tribes
Social networks -
friends, work,
community
Subject areas
Geographically collocated people
Classes
Tutorial groups
Seminars
Project

teams

ad-hoc learning networks
clubs & societies
Communities of practice

Wikipedia editors
Subject area mailing lists
alumni networks

Blends and combinations


Слайд 47Generations of distance learning pedagogies
Behaviourist/Cognitive – Self Paced, Individual Study,
Social constructivist

– Groups, classes
Connectivist – Networks
Holist - Sets and Collectives

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research on Distance and Open Learning, 12(3), 80-97

Private

Public

net


group


set


individual



Слайд 48Is the LMS BAD?
Bricolage – the LMS as Enterprise Systems doesn’t

allow or cater for bricolage.
Affordances – resulting in an inability to leverage the affordances of technology to improve learning and teaching.
Distribution – the idea that knowledge about how to improve L&T is distributed and the implications that has for the institutional practice of e-learning."

http://davidtjones.wordpress.com/

David Jones


Слайд 49Walled Gardens (with windows)
Connectivist learning thrives in safe learning spaces with

windows allowing randomness, external participation and public presentation

Слайд 50Athabasca Landing
User owned and generated tool kit


Слайд 51Enactment At Athabasca Landing


Слайд 52Landing.athabascau.ca
Elgg based, open source
Walled garden WITH windows – very fine permissions

controls
Beyond the LMS
Adoption issues


Слайд 53The Social Aggregations and Tech of 3 Generations of Connective

Pedagogies

Individuals

Groups

Networks
Sets

3rd Gen. Connectivist

2nd Gen. Social Constructivist

1st Gen
Cognitive/Behavioural





Self Paced
Learning Tech

LMS

Network
Tools


Слайд 54 aupress.ca www.irrodl.org
Open Scholars Write and Read Open Access Books
Teaching in Blended Learning


Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry
Vaughan, Cleveland-Innes,
& Garrison

Слайд 55
Jon Dron - jond@athabascau.ca
http://jondron.athabascau.ca
http://jondron.org
@jondron on almost everything

Terry Anderson- terrya@athabascau.ca
http://terrya.edublogs.org

Coming soon

(July 2014)….
Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media
http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120235

Слайд 56 Slides at http://http://tinyurl.comhttp://tinyurl.com/CNIE2014
Terry Anderson terrya@athabascau.ca
Blog: terrya.edublogs.org
Your comments and questions most welcomed!


Слайд 57Student - Teacher/Content Interaction
“MOOC video producers currently base their production

decisions on anecdotes, folk wisdom, and best practices distilled from studies with at most dozens of subjects and hundreds of video watching sessions.”

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. Retrieved from http://groups.csail.mit.edu/uid/other-pubs/las2014-pguo-engagement.pdf


Слайд 58
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video

production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. Retrieved from

Слайд 59
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video

production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. Retrieved from

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое ThePresentation.ru?

Это сайт презентаций, докладов, проектов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint. Мы помогаем школьникам, студентам, учителям, преподавателям хранить и обмениваться учебными материалами с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика