T-Tests in SAS презентация

medicine provide the typical time to relief of 100 minutes, or is it different?
Does a weekend training session have an effect on performance on an exam?
Does a new headache medicine differ in time to relief from a standard headache treatment?

are three main types of t-tests:
One-sample
Matched Pairs
Two-sample

an average or general population. You may know the average height of men in the U.S., and you could test whether a sample of professional basketball players differ significantly in height from the general U.S. population. A significant difference would indicate that basketball players belong to a different distribution of heights than the general U.S. population.

being measured on some factor at two points in time. For example, subjects could be tested on short-term memory, receive a brief tutorial on memory aids, then have their short-term memory re-tested. A significant difference in score (after-before) would indicate that the tutorial had an effect.

example, one group could receive an experimental treatment and the second group could receive a standard of care treatment or placebo.
Notice that in a two-sample t-test, two distinct groups are being compared, as opposed to the one-sample, where one group is compared to a general average, or a matched-pairs, where only one group is being measured twice.

medicine provides a relief time equal to or different from the standard of 100 minutes.
Ho: µ=100
Ha: µ≠100
We have 10 observations of time to relief. Before we can test our hypothesis, however, we have to test the data for normality.

of the normal curve.
The box-plot shows that the mean falls on the median (*--+--*), indicating no skewed data.
The formal tests of normality in the output are non-significant, indicating these data come from a normal distribution.
We can assume the data are normally distributed and proceed with the one-sample t-test.

run a t-test procedure on the variable relief, and the mean value of relief should be compared to a null value of 100.
After running this program, check your log for errors, then look at the output.

PROC TTEST DATA = relieftime h0=100;
TITLE 'One-sample T-test example‘ ;
VAR relief;
RUN;

relief time of the 10 subjects is 98.1 minutes. The calculated t* value = -1.28, and this test statistic has a p-value of 0.23 (this value is found under the label “Pr > |t|” which stands for the probability of getting a value greater than the absolute value of t*). This is a two-sided test. If this were a one-sided test, you would simply divide the p-value by 2.

Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. The new headache medicine does not provide a different time to relief from 100 minutes.

study session improves students’ test scores. Six students are given a math test before the session, then they are re-tested after the weekend training. This is a matched pairs t-test, because the same subjects are being measured before and after some intervention.
Ho: µbefore = µafter
Ha: µbefore ≠ µafter
Again, before we can analyze the data, we have to determine whether we can assume the data come from a normal distribution.

are difficult to interpret.
The box-plots for before and after both show the mean very close to the median, suggesting the data are not skewed.
The tests of normality for before and after have p-values > alpha, indicating we do not reject the assumption of normality.
We can proceed with the matched pairs t-test.

of Program for a Paired T-test” ;
PAIRED before * after;
RUN;
The code tells SAS to do a paired t-test on the data set study, and it will compare the difference of the means between before and after.

on average the scores before the weekend were lower than the scores after the training session. (If in your paired statement you had typed “after*before” the average difference would be 7.33.)
Is this difference statistically significant? To answer that question, look at the p-value. The t* for the test is -4.35, and the p-value is 0.0074.

reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we can conclude that average scores are different before and after the weekend session, and the training does improve test scores.

medicine provides a different time to relief than a control medicine. Two groups of five subjects each are either given the treatment or control.
Ho: µ1 = µ2
Ha: µ1 ≠ µ2
Before we can conduct the two-sample t-test, however, we must determine whether the data come from a normal distribution.

because it is a categorical variable
The code has specified that the univariate procedure be performed on the variable time, but that it is done by the class “group.” This way you will have separate summary statistics, plots and histograms for the treatment and control groups.

control groups are non-significant (p-value > alpha), indicating we can assume they come from a normal distribution.
Because each group only has 5 subjects, the histograms are difficult to interpret, but there is no indication of non-normality.
Proceed with the two-sample t-test

specify what distinguishes the two samples; in this case we compare the two samples defined by “group” (treatment and control), and we tell SAS to compare their mean “time” to relief.

test statistic and reach a conclusion, you must determine whether to use the pooled or unpooled variances test statistic. If we can assume the two samples have equal variances, then we use the pooled t*. If, on the other hand, we determine that the two samples have unequal variances, then we must use the unpooled t*.

have equal variances:
Ho: σ12 = σ22 vs. Ha: σ12 ≠ σ22
If the p-value > 0.05, we fail to reject the null and can conclude the variances of the two groups are equal; thus we use the pooled variances t*.
If the p-value < 0.05, we reject the null and conclude the variances of the two groups are unequal; thus we use the unpooled variances t*.
You find the F-test under the heading “Equality of Variances” in your SAS output. In our case, the p-value (Pr > F) is 0.03, which is less than 0.05; we cannot assume σ12 = σ22 . We need to use the “t Value” from the “Unpooled” Method.

p-value = 0.0141, which is less than alpha (0.05). Therefore, we reject the null and conclude that the treatment group differs significantly from the control group in time to relief from headache.
Notice from the SAS output that the treatment group took an average of about 20 minutes longer to feel relief than the control group (“Diff (1-2)”), implying the treatment is significantly worse than the control.