Hélène Thibault
Fall 2016
- Главная
- Разное
- Дизайн
- Бизнес и предпринимательство
- Аналитика
- Образование
- Развлечения
- Красота и здоровье
- Финансы
- Государство
- Путешествия
- Спорт
- Недвижимость
- Армия
- Графика
- Культурология
- Еда и кулинария
- Лингвистика
- Английский язык
- Астрономия
- Алгебра
- Биология
- География
- Детские презентации
- Информатика
- История
- Литература
- Маркетинг
- Математика
- Медицина
- Менеджмент
- Музыка
- МХК
- Немецкий язык
- ОБЖ
- Обществознание
- Окружающий мир
- Педагогика
- Русский язык
- Технология
- Физика
- Философия
- Химия
- Шаблоны, картинки для презентаций
- Экология
- Экономика
- Юриспруденция
PLS 140 Introduction to comparative politics. Centenno vs Tilly презентация
Содержание
- 1. PLS 140 Introduction to comparative politics. Centenno vs Tilly
- 2. Centenno vs Tilly Centenno questions Tilly’s theory:
- 3. Modern State power - Legitimacy When someone
- 4. Max Weber’s typology Traditional: based on historical
- 5. Centralization vs Decentralization
- 6. Devolution of power Negotiated regional autonomy
- 7. Devolution of power Federalism: a system of
- 9. Canada’s asymmetric federalism 10 provinces, 3 territories.
- 10. Canadian and provincial prime ministers
- 11. Federal jurisdiction include: citizenship trade and
- 12. Provincial competencies Healthcare Education Culture Environment Transport
- 13. Problems with CA`s federalism Basic level: some
- 14. Devolution gone wrong Political entrepreneurs can use
- 15. Unitary systems Central/national government has complete authority
- 16. KZ`s unitary State 14 Provinces and 2
- 17. Pro et contra Pro Clear rules →
Centenno vs Tilly Centenno questions Tilly’s theory: War → Fiscal capacities (penetration, army, bureaucracy)→State. The model does not work in Latin America where State structures did not reach a minimum
Слайд 2Centenno vs Tilly
Centenno questions Tilly’s theory: War → Fiscal capacities (penetration,
army, bureaucracy)→State.
The model does not work in Latin America where State structures did not reach a minimum threshold.
State precedes war.
LA States unable to collect taxes.. not enough wealth!
Income from extraction did not require bureaucratic development (customs revenues and international loans).
The authorities met stiff resistance from powerful landowners.
The model does not work in Latin America where State structures did not reach a minimum threshold.
State precedes war.
LA States unable to collect taxes.. not enough wealth!
Income from extraction did not require bureaucratic development (customs revenues and international loans).
The authorities met stiff resistance from powerful landowners.
Слайд 3Modern State power - Legitimacy
When someone or something is recognized and
accepted as right and proper.
Confers authority and power so that people abides by laws.
Reciprocal responsibilities.
Without it, the State would have to constantly use force. Examples?
Confers authority and power so that people abides by laws.
Reciprocal responsibilities.
Without it, the State would have to constantly use force. Examples?
Слайд 4Max Weber’s typology
Traditional: based on historical myths and continuity, institutionalized. Ex:
British monarchy.
Charismatic: based on the charisma of the leader and his/her ideas, +- institutionalized. Ex: Lenin, Gaddafi, Trump?
Rational-legal: Based on neutral rules and procedures, highly institutionalized. Ex: elected presidents and parliaments.
Charismatic: based on the charisma of the leader and his/her ideas, +- institutionalized. Ex: Lenin, Gaddafi, Trump?
Rational-legal: Based on neutral rules and procedures, highly institutionalized. Ex: elected presidents and parliaments.
Слайд 6Devolution of power
Negotiated regional autonomy an effective antidote for ethnopolitical wars
of secession in Western and Third World States.
Provides religious, ethnic, and cultural minority groups with a political base in which they can control cultural and educational policies.
Provides religious, ethnic, and cultural minority groups with a political base in which they can control cultural and educational policies.
Слайд 7Devolution of power
Federalism: a system of government in which the same
territory is controlled by two (or more) levels of government.
Ex: Germany, United States, Mexico, India.
Asymmetric federalism: Power is divided unevenly between bodies.
Ex: Canada, Spain, Russia.
Ex: Germany, United States, Mexico, India.
Asymmetric federalism: Power is divided unevenly between bodies.
Ex: Canada, Spain, Russia.
Слайд 9Canada’s asymmetric federalism
10 provinces, 3 territories.
Provinces have their own elected parliaments
and prime ministers.
Separate spheres of competences.
Taxation power.
Separate spheres of competences.
Taxation power.
Слайд 11Federal jurisdiction include:
citizenship
trade and commerce
direct and indirect taxation
currency
the postal service
national defence
navigation, fisheries
Aboriginals and Indian reserves
official languages within the federal sphere,
foreign affairs
emergency powers in peace and war
Слайд 12Provincial competencies
Healthcare
Education
Culture
Environment
Transport
Social security/care
Sports
For Québec only: international relations, immigration, pension plans.
Слайд 13Problems with CA`s federalism
Basic level: some administrative complications for citizens.
Division over
the allocation of resources: who gets what from the federal government?
Blurred lines of respective competences.
Endless constitutional debates.
Political rivalry and resentment between provinces.
Undermines national unity?
Blurred lines of respective competences.
Endless constitutional debates.
Political rivalry and resentment between provinces.
Undermines national unity?
Слайд 14Devolution gone wrong
Political entrepreneurs can use the resources of the administrative
unit and the bureaucracy to advance a nationalist cause.
Ex: Québec, Catalonia, Scotland.
Easier when they receive external support.
Ex: Ossetia, Abkhazia, Kosovo.
Ex: Québec, Catalonia, Scotland.
Easier when they receive external support.
Ex: Ossetia, Abkhazia, Kosovo.
Слайд 15Unitary systems
Central/national government has complete authority over other political divisions or
administrative units.
Local governing bodies serve as administrative arms of the central government.
Of the 193 UN member states, 165 of them are unitary States.
Local governing bodies serve as administrative arms of the central government.
Of the 193 UN member states, 165 of them are unitary States.
Слайд 16KZ`s unitary State
14 Provinces and 2 municipal districts (Almaty and Astana).
Akim is appointed by the president. Municipal Akims are appointed by Province Akims.
Слайд 17Pro et contra
Pro
Clear rules → Efficiency and promptness.
Political unity.
Contra
Potential absence of
local democracy.
Likeliness of local interests not represented.
Risks of authoritarian practices.
Likeliness of local interests not represented.
Risks of authoritarian practices.
