1 презентация

Содержание

- - Metrics Support Desired Outcomes Outcomes require Decisions require Insights require Measurements Measurements inspire Insights inform Decisions drive Outcomes

Слайд 2


Слайд 4- -
Metrics Support Desired Outcomes
Outcomes require
Decisions require
Insights require
Measurements
Measurements inspire
Insights inform
Decisions drive
Outcomes


Слайд 5- -
Agility Throughout the Business System


Слайд 6- -
Enterprise Scale Agile
Teams working together deliver value faster





Слайд 7Cadence and Synchronization
- -
RELEASE
PLANNING
DEMO & RETROSPECTIVE
RELEASES / MILESTONES
ITERATIONS (Synchronized)


Слайд 8Organized for the Work
- -


Слайд 9Measure and improve performance
Guide team execution and value delivery
Correlate value

delivered with strategic priorities

- -

How Metrics Can Help You Succeed


Слайд 10Build an effective measurement plan
Identify traps and actively manage them
Inspect and

adapt!

- -

How Do You Get There?


Слайд 11Agile Metrics to Guide Delivery
Will we meet our delivery commitments?
- -


Слайд 12Agile Teams
Will we complete our work in an iteration (stories, tasks,

defects, etc.)?

Agile Delivery Groups
Will we meet our plan objectives (features, milestones, quality, etc.)?

- -

Agile Steering


Слайд 14- -
Maturity and Metrics


Слайд 15- -
Maturity and Metrics


Слайд 16- -
Teams: Healthy Cumulative Flow


Слайд 17- -
Cumulative Flow: WTWF


Слайд 18- -
Teams: Consistent Iteration Health Message


Слайд 19- -
Delivery: Release Tracking


Слайд 20- -
Delivery: Plan and Milestone Progress


Слайд 21- -
Delivery: Initiative Progress


Слайд 22- -
Delivery: Feature Responsiveness


Слайд 23- -
Delivery: Performance Consistency


Слайд 24Data-driven Continuous Improvement
How do we achieve our goals over time?
- -


Слайд 25Performance KPIs
Are our teams healthy?
How much can we predictably deliver?
What improvements

would we value most?
What improvement action will we try next?

- -

Performance Metrics Support Outcomes


Слайд 26- -
Software Development Performance Index


Слайд 27- -
Findings
160,000
50,000
13,000


Слайд 28- -
SDPI Dimensions
Productivity = Throughput
Predictability = Consistency of throughput
Responsiveness = Time

in process (TiP)
Quality = Released defect density

Слайд 29The Impact of Agile Quantified
- -


Слайд 30Work Interacts (Through Workers) …
- -
… and Impacts Throughput


Слайд 31- -
Work in Process


Слайд 32
- -
Limit WiP

Key Findings
Teams that aggressively control WiP:
Cut time in process

in half
Have ¼ as many defects
But have 34% lower Productivity

Recommendations
If your WiP is high, reduce it
If your WiP is already low, consider your economic drivers
If Productivity drives your bottom line, don’t push WiP too low
If Time To Market drives your bottom line, push WiP as low as it will go


Слайд 33- -
“We can see that there is almost
a 2:1 difference

in throughput
between teams that are 95% or more
dedicated compared with teams that
are 50% or less dedicated.”

Stable Teams


Слайд 34Boost Efficiency and Innovation
“We uncovered the performance costs of unstable teams

… and are seeing 30 - 50% improvements in both cost and delivery duration compared to similar waterfall projects.”
– Michael Santoro, Director, GVS Global Business Partnership Team

Слайд 35Recommendations
Limit WiP
If practicing Scrum, use two-week iterations; task out stories
Size

teams appropriately: 7 +/- 2 for balanced performance (larger teams are okay)
Have dedicated and stable teams
Encourage small stories

- -


Слайд 36Traps
What will impede our outcomes?
- -


Слайд 37Common Metrics Traps
Manipulation
Unbalanced metrics
Costly KPIs
Availability bias
Mechanical decision-making
False negatives
- -


Слайд 38- -
False Negatives


Слайд 39Data Integrity Checks for Insights
Quality stories (avoid stories that are really tasks

and/or fake stories)
Mapping kanban states to schedule state values (especially in-progress and accepted)
Quantity of in-progress split stories (splitting stories at the end of the iteration)
Defect state value accuracy
Consistent use of defect environment field value
Consistent use of defect priority field




- -


Слайд 40- -
Use Case: Annual Company Disruptions


Слайд 41The Seven Deadly Sins of Agile Measurement Whitepaper
The Impact of Agile

Quantified: SDPI Whitepaper
Agile Reports and Metrics Rally Help
Rally Success Program

- -

To Learn More...


Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое ThePresentation.ru?

Это сайт презентаций, докладов, проектов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint. Мы помогаем школьникам, студентам, учителям, преподавателям хранить и обмениваться учебными материалами с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика