Mark Snyder & Allen M. Omoto
Presented by: Leslie Wheeler & Megan Blazek
- Главная
- Разное
- Дизайн
- Бизнес и предпринимательство
- Аналитика
- Образование
- Развлечения
- Красота и здоровье
- Финансы
- Государство
- Путешествия
- Спорт
- Недвижимость
- Армия
- Графика
- Культурология
- Еда и кулинария
- Лингвистика
- Английский язык
- Астрономия
- Алгебра
- Биология
- География
- Детские презентации
- Информатика
- История
- Литература
- Маркетинг
- Математика
- Медицина
- Менеджмент
- Музыка
- МХК
- Немецкий язык
- ОБЖ
- Обществознание
- Окружающий мир
- Педагогика
- Русский язык
- Технология
- Физика
- Философия
- Химия
- Шаблоны, картинки для презентаций
- Экология
- Экономика
- Юриспруденция
The Relationship Closeness Inventory презентация
Содержание
- 1. The Relationship Closeness Inventory
- 2. Key Operational Definitions Frequency: Number of hours
- 3. Subjects Undergraduate students from University of Minnesota.
- 4. Goal To develop a test of interpersonal
- 5. Method Ask students to identify the person
- 6. Results Test-Retest: Paired t-tests showed no significant
- 7. Results Cont. Satisfactory reliability and validity A
- 8. Conclusions Closeness is thought to be a
- 9. Sample Questions Identification of person Work: Which
- 10. Sample Questions Cont. Diversity IN the past
- 11. The End Thanks! Leslie Wheeler & Megan Blazek
Слайд 1The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships
Ellen Berscheid,
Слайд 2Key Operational Definitions
Frequency: Number of hours and minutes spent alone with
another person during waking hours (range: 0-1,200 min.)
Diversity: Number of activities from a list of 38 that the pair spends together.
Strength: The amount of impact (little to very much) one person has on the other’s plans.
Diversity: Number of activities from a list of 38 that the pair spends together.
Strength: The amount of impact (little to very much) one person has on the other’s plans.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 3Subjects
Undergraduate students from University of Minnesota.
Ages: 18-49
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. &
Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Mean age: 19.38
Modal participants: 19-20 year-old full-time student who is single.
Слайд 4Goal
To develop a test of interpersonal closeness using operational definitions that
can be assessed by self-report.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 5Method
Ask students to identify the person with whom they consider them
closest.
Using questionnaires determine closeness according to frequency, diversity, and strength.
Take individual scores and create an overall index of interpersonal closeness.
Sum scores and weigh each subscale equally on a 10-point metric.
Using questionnaires determine closeness according to frequency, diversity, and strength.
Take individual scores and create an overall index of interpersonal closeness.
Sum scores and weigh each subscale equally on a 10-point metric.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 6Results
Test-Retest: Paired t-tests showed no significant differences between test 1 and
test 2.
Romantic relationships were closer than friends or family.
No sex differences
Negative correlation between longevity and closeness
Highly significant differences between close relationships and not close relationships
Romantic relationships were closer than friends or family.
No sex differences
Negative correlation between longevity and closeness
Highly significant differences between close relationships and not close relationships
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 7Results Cont.
Satisfactory reliability and validity
A correlation of scores between partners were
shown, but not extremely high.
Слайд 8Conclusions
Closeness is thought to be a major part of relationships and
can predict certain behavior.
This test provides information that spans different types of relationships.
The RCI should be used in conjunction with other tests, not alone.
This test provides information that spans different types of relationships.
The RCI should be used in conjunction with other tests, not alone.
Слайд 9Sample Questions
Identification of person
Work: Which of the following best describes your
relationship with this person? (Check only one)__ co-worker __ your boss/supervisor __ your subordinate
Frequency
DURING THE PAST WEEK, what is the average amount of time, per day, that you spent alone with X in the MORNING?
Frequency
DURING THE PAST WEEK, what is the average amount of time, per day, that you spent alone with X in the MORNING?
Слайд 10Sample Questions Cont.
Diversity
IN the past week, I did the foling activities
alone with X: (Check all that apply)
__ did laundry
__ prepared a meal
__ watched TV
Strength
Using the 7-point scale below, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree by writing the appropriate number in the space corresponding to each item
__ X will influence my future financial security
__ X does not influence everyday things in my life.
__ did laundry
__ prepared a meal
__ watched TV
Strength
Using the 7-point scale below, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree by writing the appropriate number in the space corresponding to each item
__ X will influence my future financial security
__ X does not influence everyday things in my life.
