ISTP 2014 Equity, excellence and inclusiveness in education презентация

Содержание

Skills transform lives and drive economies Odds ratio Increased likelihood of positive outcomes for adults with higher literacy skills (scoring at PIAAC Level 4/5 compared with those scoring at Level 1

Слайд 1ISTP 2014
Equity, excellence
and inclusiveness
in education
Wellington, 28 March
Andreas Schleicher


Слайд 2Skills transform lives and drive economies
Odds ratio
Increased likelihood of positive outcomes

for adults with higher literacy skills (scoring at PIAAC Level 4/5 compared with those scoring at Level 1 or below)


Слайд 3



Inequality in skills relates to
how wealth is shared in nations


Слайд 4




Literacy skills inequality (9th/1st decile)
Income inequality (Gini coefficient)
Low income inequality
Low skills

inequality

High income inequality
Low skills inequality

High income inequality
High skills inequality

Low income inequality
High skills inequality

Average

Average

Inequality in skills relates to
how wealth is shared in nations


Слайд 5


The false choice between equity and excellence


The false choice between equity and

excellence
Some evidence from PISA 2012

Слайд 6PISA in brief

Over half a million students…
representing 28 million 15-year-olds in

65 countries/economies
… took an internationally agreed 2-hour test…
Goes beyond testing whether students can reproduce what they were taught…
… to assess students’ capacity to extrapolate from what they know and creatively apply their knowledge in novel situations
Mathematics, reading, science, problem-solving, financial literacy
Total of 390 minutes of assessment material
… and responded to questions on…
their personal background, their schools and their engagement with learning and school
Parents, principals and system leaders provided data on…
school policies, practices, resources and institutional factors that help explain performance differences .


Слайд 7
High mathematics performance
Low mathematics performance
… Shanghai-China performs above this line (613)

… 12 countries perform below this line




Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 8



Socially equitable
distribution of learning
opportunities
High mathematics performance
Low mathematics performance
Strong socio-economic


impact on student
performance



Слайд 9





2012
Socially equitable
distribution of learning
opportunities
Strong socio-economic
impact on student
performance


Слайд 10





2012
Socially equitable
distribution of learning
opportunities
Strong socio-economic
impact on student
performance


Слайд 12 Contribution of various factors to upper secondary teacher compensation costs, per

student as a percentage of GDP per capita (2004)

Percentage points






Слайд 14














Singapore
Shanghai
Singapore
2003 - 2012
Germany, Turkey and Mexico improved both their mathematics performance

and equity levels

Brazil, Italy, Macao-China, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Thailand and Tunisia improved their mathematics performance (no change in equity)

Liechtenstein, Norway, the United States and Switzerland improved their equity levels (no change in performance)


Слайд 15


Fostering resilience

The country where students go to class matters more than

what social class students come from



Слайд 16


PISA mathematics performance
by decile of social background


Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 17
Percentage of resilient students
More than 10% resilient
Between 5%-10% of resilient students
Less

than 5%

Fig II.2.4


Socio-economically disadvantaged students not only score lower in mathematics, they also report lower levels of engagement, drive, motivation and self-beliefs. Resilient students break this link and share many characteristics of advantaged high-achievers.

A resilient student is situated in the bottom quarter of
the PISA index of economic, social and cultural
status (ESCS) in the country of assessment and
performs in the top quarter of students among all
countries, after accounting for socio-economic status.

Massachusetts

Connecticut

Florida


Слайд 182003
2003
2003
2012
2012
2012

Don’t close achievement gaps the wrong way Performance differences between top and

bottom quarter of socio-economic distribution

Quarter of most disadvantaged students

PISA performance (mathematics)

Quarter of most privileged students

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 19


The rising demand for advanced skills


%
Evolution of employment in occupational groups

defined by PIAAC problem-solving skills

Employment of workers with advanced problem-solving skills

Employment of workers with poor problem-solving skills

Employment of workers with medium-low problem-solving skills (PIAAC)

Source:PIAAC 2011


Слайд 20
Building excellence Percentage of top performers in mathematics
Tab I.2.1a
Across OECD, 13% of

students are top performers (Level 5 or 6). They can develop and work with models for complex situations, and work strategically with advanced thinking and reasoning skills

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 21



Low impact on outcomes
High impact on outcomes
Low feasibility
High feasibility
Money pits
Must haves
Low

hanging fruits

Quick wins

Excellence, Equity and Inclusiveness


Слайд 22



Low impact on outcomes
High impact on outcomes

Low feasibility
High feasibility
Money pits
Must haves
Low

hanging fruits

Quick wins


Attract, nurture and retain high quality teachers for the schools in greatest need

Allocate resources equitably

Make high quality early-childhood education accessible

Encourage autonomy in the context of accountability

Avoid segregation and stratification

Use assessment and evaluation to identify and support struggling students and schools


Слайд 23


Align the resources with the challenges


Countering disadvantage without rewarding underperformance


Слайд 24
Spending per student from the age of 6 to 15 and

mathematics performance in PISA 2012

Fig IV.1.8

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 25Teacher shortage

Fig IV.3.5

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 26


Align the resources with the challenges




Adjusted by per capita GDP


Countries with

better performance in mathematics tend to allocate educational resources more equitably 

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 27


Adequate resources to address disadvantage


Disadvantaged schools reported more teacher shortage
Advantaged schools

reported more teacher shortage



A shortage of qualified teachers is more of concern in disadvantaged schools


Слайд 28


Align the resources with the challenges


Incremental cost
Administrative discretion
Formula funding
Countering disadvantage without

rewarding underperformance

Слайд 29Adequacy of educational resources

Fig IV.3.8


Слайд 30Educational resources are more problematic in disadvantaged schools

Advantaged and private schools

reported better educational resources

Disadvantaged and public schools reported better educational resources


Fig IV.3.8


Слайд 31
Proportion of immigrant students in socio-economically disadvantaged and advantaged schools
Fig II.3.9

Percentage

of immigrant students

Слайд 32


Reflect student demography among teachers


…it helps not just minority students but

everyone to better appreciate diversity and other peoples’ cultures

Слайд 33



Prepare for work in disadvantaged schools

Preparation
Prepare teachers for work in

disadvantage

Provide mentoring in disadvantage

Improve working conditions

Career and financial incentives

Reinforce initial teacher training including curriculum content for disadvantage
Strengthening diagnostic capacity
Include practical field experience

Both new and experienced teachers benefit
Pedagogical and relational strategies


Слайд 34



Attractive employment and careers

Careers
Effective employment conditions

Building careers around teaching in tough

contexts

Professional development to address diversity

Educate the teacher educators

Attracting talent
Flexible employment
Enhance mobility
Transparency in teacher labour market


Слайд 35


Achieving equity in devolved school systems
The question is not how many

charter schools you have but how you enable every teacher to assume charter-like autonomy

Слайд 36



Countries that grant schools autonomy over curricula and assessments tend to

perform better in mathematics  

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 37Schools with more autonomy perform better than schools with less autonomy

in systems with standardised math policies

Score points

School autonomy for curriculum and assessment
x system's extent of implementing a standardised math policy (e.g. curriculum and instructional materials)


Fig IV.1.16

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 38Schools with more autonomy perform better than schools with less autonomy

in systems with more collaboration

Score points

School autonomy for resource allocation x System's level of teachers participating in school management
Across all participating countries and economies


Fig IV.1.17

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 39Schools with more autonomy perform better than schools with less autonomy

in systems with more accountability arrangements

Score points

School autonomy for curriculum and assessment
x system's level of posting achievement data publicly


Fig IV.1.16

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 40Holistic approach to quality assurance and school improvement

Fig IV.4.14

Effective accountability
Aligned incentive

structures
For students
How gateways affect the strength, direction, clarity and nature of the incentives operating on students at each stage of their education
Degree to which students have incentives to take tough courses and study hard
Opportunity costs for staying in school and performing well
For teachers
Make innovations in pedagogy and/or organisation
Improve their own performance and the performance of their colleagues
Pursue professional development opportunities that lead to stronger pedagogical practices
A balance between vertical and lateral accountability
Effective instruments to manage and share knowledge and spread innovation – communication within the system and with stakeholders around it
A capable centre with authority and legitimacy to act

Слайд 41


School choice - what parents value


Слайд 42A school’s particular approach to teaching is not a determining factor

when parents choose a school for their child

Percentage of parents who reported that a particular approach to pedagogy is a very important criterion when choosing a school for their child


Fig IV.4.5

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 43Financial aid for school is a greater concern among disadvantaged parents
Percentage

of parents who reported that the availability of financial aid, such as a school loan, scholarship or grant, is a very important criterion when choosing a school for their child


Fig IV.4.5

Privileged parents value financial assistance less

Disadvantaged parents value financial assistance more

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 44Advantaged families tend to seek out schools whose students are high

achievers

Percentage of parents who reported that students’ high academic achievement is a very important criterion in choosing a school for their child


Fig IV.4.5

Privileged parents care much more about high standards

While disadvantaged parents worry about other things more

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 45Advantaged parents tend to seek out schools with an active and

pleasant climate

Percentage of parents who reported that an active and pleasant climate is a very important criterion when choosing a school for their child


Fig IV.4.5

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 46Parents everywhere look for a safe school environment for their child
Percentage

of parents who reported that a safe school environment is a very important criterion in choosing a school for their child


Fig IV.4.5

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 47Parents’ expectations for their child have a strong influence on students’

behaviour towards school


Fig III.6.11

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 48Parents’ high expectations can nurture students’ enjoyment in learning mathematics

Fig III.6.11
Source:

PISA 2012

Слайд 49Parents’ high expectations can foster perseverance in their child

Fig III.6.11
Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 50
Difference in mathematics performance, by attendance at pre-primary school
Students who

attended pre-primary
school perform better

Fig III.4.12

Invest early

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 51



Square school choice with equity

Financial incentives for schools
Assistance for disadvantaged parents
Controlled

choice

Financial incentives

Inform parents

Foster collaboration among teachers and schools

Use student and school assessments

Provide support for teachers to exercise leadership in developing and improving professional practice
Help teachers to be heard and to influence policy making, including on the content and structure of the curriculum
Support teachers in setting the direction of their own professional development and in contributing to the professional development of their colleagues
Enhance the key role teachers play in building collaborative relationships with parents and the wider community
Promote the role of teachers in pupil assessment, teacher appraisal and school evaluation
Enable teachers to participate in activities that lead to the creation and transfer of professional knowledge.


Слайд 52


Inclusive learning environments


Creating learning environments that meet the needs of all

children

Слайд 53


High expectations for all students

OECD average


Countries where students have stronger beliefs in

their abilities perform better in mathematics

Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 54


Disadvantaged students tend to skip school

Fig III.2.10

B
Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 55Countries with large proportions of truants perform worse in mathematics

Fig IV.1.22
B
Source:

PISA 2012

Слайд 56


A continuum of support for struggling students

Make learning central, encourage engagement

and responsibility
Be acutely sensitive to individual differences
Provide continual assessment with formative feedback
Be demanding for every student
Ensure that students feel valued and included and learning is collaborative

Слайд 57


Supportive school climate

School climate
Focus on teacher-student and peer-relationships

Adequate and timely student

support

Alternative organisation of instruction time

Positive management


Слайд 58


A data-rich school environment

National and school data
School-based strategies for analysis
Data for

supporting learning

Слайд 59



Reduce tracking and grade repetition

Both vertical and horizontal stratification hurt equity


Слайд 60
Grade repetition sets the wrong incentives 
Fig IV.1.4
R2=0.05
Greater equity
Less equity
R2=0.07
Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 61Grade repetition is an expensive policy

Fig IV.1.5
Source: PISA 2012


Слайд 62


Reach out to communities

Use diverse communication channels

Ensure balanced communication

Reach out to

disadvantaged parents

Clear guidelines on what is expected from parents


Слайд 63


Strengthen school leadership

Leadership preparation with specialised knowledge on disadvantage
Reinforce coaching and

strengthen school networks
Attract great leaders to tough schools

Слайд 64


Systemic approach to restructuring schools


Context sensitivity
Targeted resources
Formal common planning time
Merit recognition

for success
Firm action for persistent underperformance

Слайд 65


Thank you

Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org
All publications
The complete

micro-level database

Email: Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.org
Twitter: SchleicherEDU

and remember:
Without data, you are just another person with an opinion

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое ThePresentation.ru?

Это сайт презентаций, докладов, проектов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint. Мы помогаем школьникам, студентам, учителям, преподавателям хранить и обмениваться учебными материалами с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика