Incidence of all malignant neoplasms
Incidence of neuroendocrine tumors
Lawrence B et al., Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40:1-18, 2011; Niederle et al. Endocrine Relat Cancer 17:909-918, 2010
Prospective Registry, Austria
SEER 9 Registry, 1973-2007
The most substantial change in incidence over time occurred in small intestinal and rectal NETs, and these are now the most common GEP-NETs according to SEER 9 Registry
Insulinoma
Gastrinoma
Glucagonoma
VIPoma
Zollinger Ellison’s syndrome
Pulmonary
Gastro- intestinal
Other
life-threatening complication
10–20% of patients with CS have CHD
1. Yao JC, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 3063-3072; 2. Hofland LJ & Lamberts SW, Endocrine Reviews. 2003. 24(1): 28-47.
Tumours with well- and moderately differentiated histology1
CI = confidence interval
5-year survival rate for GEP-NET: 68.1%
Pancreas: 37.6%
Colon: 54.6%
Stomach: 64.1%
Small intestine: 68.1%
Appendix: 81.3%
Rectum: 88.5%
50% of patients have died at:
10.3 mo (colonic NETs)
16.7 mo (gastric NETs)
18.9 mo (pancreatic NETs)
*SEER 17 registry, 1973 - 2007
HPF, high-power field; NETs, neuroendocrine tumors; WHO, World Health Organization.
Klimstra DS, et al. Pancreas. 2010;39(6):707-712.
Lawrence B, et al. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40(1):1-18.
WHO 2010 Classification
Prognosis of patients with NETs
1 ENETS grading system.
2 10 HPF = 2 mm2 at least 40 fields (40 × magnification) evaluated in areas of highest mitotic density.
3 Percentage of 2,000 tumour cells in areas of highest nuclear labelling with MIB1 antibody.
anorexia
Courtesy K. Oberg, Uppsala
Lanreotide autogel 120 mg
N=204
PFS
Midgut, hingut, pancreatic
Non-functional
Octreoscan POS 100%
Live involvement up to 10% - 52%
Progression confirmed by two scans (12-24 week interval)
Diarrhoea 37.3%
Steatorrhoea 28.6%
Flatulence 28.1%
Pain at injection site 28.1%
Gallstones 17.9%
Emesis 11.5%
Hyperglycaemia 10.8%
Bradycardia 4.3%
Cholangitis 4.3%
Septicaemia < 1%
Most side effects are transient
Very good long-term tolerability
Secondary endpoints:
Objective tumour response
Disease control rate
Quality of Life
Biochemical markers
Blinded Treatment Period
Screening
Pasireotide LAR 60mg IM every 28 days
Octreotide LAR 40mg IM every 28 days
Phase III Randomised, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to evaluate pasireotide for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome
Day 1
Week 4
Week 8
Week 12
Week 16
Week 20
Week 24
Option to continue
On extension study (2 years)
Non-responders on octreotide cross over to pasireotide (unblinded)
Primary efficacy analysis
Secondary and exploratory endpoints
a Double-blind SC injections, as required to achieve/maintain control.
Temporary dose reductions allowed, if needed for tolerability
Targeted enrollment: 216 patients
Patients:
carcinoid tumours and symptoms (diarrhoea and flushing) that are not adequately controlled by SSA
Wolin, EM. et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31 (suppl.) Abstract #4031.
0
3
6
9
12
Time, months
15
21
27
0
Time (months)
3
6
9
12
15
21
27
56
OCT
34
10
3
0
-
-
-
52
PAS
35
22
18
9
4
3
1
Survival Probability
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
OCT n/N = 20/56
PAS n/N = 18/52
Censored
Kaplan-Meier median PFS
PAS: 11.8 months, 95% CI [11.0–not reached]
OCT: 6.8 months, 95% CI [5.6–not reached]
Hazard ratio = 0.46, 95% CI [0.20–0.98]
Total events = 38
P = 0.045 (log-rank test)
CI, confidence interval; OCT, octreotide LAR; PAS, pasireotide LAR; PFS, progression-free survival
1. Liu Q, Yang Q, Sun W, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 325:47–55. 2. Kulke MH, O'Dorisio T, Phan A, et al. Endocr Relat Cancer 2014;21:705–714. 3. Pavel M, Horsch D, Caplin M, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:1511–1519
The recommended dose is 250 mg three times daily
86
39
19
4
0
0
Sunitinib
85
28
7
2
1
0
Placebo
Subjects at risk, n
HR, 0.418
95% CI, 0.26-0.66
P = 0.000118*
*P-value might be misleading due to multiple early looks
Sunitinib, Median 11.4 months
Placebo,
Median 5.5 months
Probability of Progression-free
Survival (%)
Months since Randomization
Well differentiated advanced pNET patients
(N = 171 enrolled / 340 planned)
(Somatostatin analogues were permitted)
ORR 9.3 vs 0%
pNET
A/E: hypertension, proteinuria, arterial thromboembolism, heart failure, thyroid dysfunction, bleeding, myelosuppression, hand-foot syndrome, hepatotoxicity
Reviewed ini Demirkan, B. & Eriksson, B. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23 (5): 427-437
1. Ekeblad, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(10):2986-91. 2. Kulke, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S)(June 20 suppl.):4044.
3. Kulke, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S)(June 20 supplement):4505. 4. Strosberg JR, et al. Cancer. 2011;117:268-275
RR = response rate; GI = gastrointestinal; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours
Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:
Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть