Gary King, Harvard University and the Director of the Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Level 0
Personalized Medicine
& Prescriptive Analytics
Clinical Risk Intervention
& Predictive Analytics
Population Health Management
& Suggestive Analytics
Waste & Care Variability Reduction
Automated External Reporting
Automated Internal Reporting
Standardized Vocabulary
& Patient Registries
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Fragmented Point Solutions
Tailoring patient care based on population outcomes and genomic data. Fee-for-quality rewards health maintenance.
Organizational processes for intervention are supported with predictive risk models. Fee-for-quality includes fixed per capita payment.
Tailoring patient care based on population metrics. Fee-for-quality includes bundled per case payment.
Reducing variability in care processes. Focusing on internal optimization and waste reduction.
Efficient, consistent production of reports & adaptability to changing requirements.
Efficient, consistent production of reports & widespread availability in the organization.
Relating and organizing the core data content.
Collecting and integrating the core data content.
Inefficient, inconsistent versions of the truth. Cumbersome internal and external reporting.
© Sanders, Protti, Burton, 2013
As it turns out, the latter can be applied to the former, so the two schools of thought are now generally interchangeable. Don’t let vendors fool you into thinking that “machine learning” is more sophisticated or better than predictive modeling.
But, if we sample that analog process enough, we can approximately recreate it with digital data
Remember Your Calculus Digital Sampling Theory?
* The Economist, “Big data can help states decide whom to release from prison” April 19, 2014
“Evidence Based” Sentencing
Criminal history
Education/employment
Family/marital
Leisure/recreation
Companions
Alcohol/drug problems
Antisocial patterns
Pro-criminal attitude orientation
Barriers to release
Case management plan
Progress record
Discharge summary
Specific risk/needs factors
Prison experience - institutional factors
Special responsivity consideration
42.2% of high-risk offenders recidivate within 3 years
*Nov. 2012, Hennepin County, Minn. Department of Community Corrections and Rehabilitation
Thank you, Thod Nugyen, eHarmony CTO
Very Little ACO Influence
Very Little ACO Influence
>/=30% Waste*
100% ACO Influence
*Congressional Budget Office, IOM, “Best Care at Lower Cost”, 2013
True Population Health Management
Socioeconomic Data Matters
Return on Engagement (ROE)
For > 1 year of encounters
(~5 yrs and 26k patients)
These aren’t really outcomes… they are proxies for outcomes
Presence of:
Cardiovascular disease (angina, MI, stroke)
Nephropathy/End stage renal
Diabetic retinopathy
Glaucoma
Cataracts
Lower extremity tissue narcosis, foot ulcers
Peripheral neuropathy
Diabetic ketoacidosis
Diabetic preeclampsia
GI complications (nausea, constipation)
Erectile dysfunction
Diabetes
Cohort
(~5 yrs and 26k patients)
Thank you, Dave Claussen, Scott Evans, et al, Intermountain Healthcare
The Antibiotic Assistant
Closing Thoughts and Questions
Если не удалось найти и скачать презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:
Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть